Singapore Med J 2013; 54(2): e46-e49; http://dx.doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2013040
Artefactual spikes in electrocardiography: a worthwhile introspection
Moni M, Rajda J, Lakshmanadoss U
Correspondence: Dr Umashankar Lakshmanadoss, drlumashankar@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Electrical devices, which have become an integral part of our daily life, may influence the electrical recording of the heart. These disturbances from external sources outside of the heart’s own activity produce changes in the electrocardiography (ECG) of the patient, simulating rhythmic disturbances of the heart. Understanding these disturbances is essential in order to better interprete the ECG. Common sources of electrical interferences include external devices, such as alternating current and improper earthing, and surgical procedures like diathermy. We report a case of electrical interference in a patient’s ECG due to an inserted bladder stimulator. This case report highlights the importance of precise identification of artefacts in the interpretation of ECG, as well as prompt localisation and elimination of the source of interference.
Keywords: artifacts, electrocardiography, implanted neurostimulator
Singapore Med J 2013; 54(2): e46–e49; http://dx.doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2013040
REFERENCES
1. Bennett FT, Bennett KR, Markov AK. Einthoven's Triangle: Lead Errors and an Algorithm for Solution. Am J Med Sci 2005; 329:71-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000441-200502000-00004 |
|
2. John EM. Electrocardiographic artifact induced by an electrical stimulator implanted for management of neurogenic bladder, J Electrocardiol 2008; 41:401-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2008.02.029 |
|
3. Medtronic Neuromodulation Products and Therapies/Healthcare Professionals [online]. Available at: http://professional.medtronic.com/pt/uro/snm/prod/interstim/index.htm#.U.... Accessed January 20, 2013. |
|
4. Lakshmanadoss U, Chinnachamy P, Daubert JP. Electromagnetic Interference of the Pacemakers. In: INTECH [online]. Available at: www.intechopen.com/articles/show/title/electromagnetic-interference-of-t.... Accessed March 3, 2011. |
|
5. Society for Cardiological Science and Technology. Clinical guidelines by consensus, number 1: recording a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram. London:Society for Cardiological Science and Technology, 2005. |
|
6. Drew BJ. Pitfalls and Artifacts in Electrocardiography. Cardiol Clin 2006; 24:309-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccl.2006.04.006 |
|
7. Chernecky C, Garrett K, George-Gay B, Hodges RK. Saunders Nursing survival guide: ECGs and the Heart. 2nd ed. St Louis: Saunders Elsevier, 2006. |