Attitudes and perceptions of the general Malaysian public regarding family presence during resuscitation

Chew KS, Ghani ZA
Correspondence: Dr Chew Keng Sheng, cksheng74@yahoo.com

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION Family presence (FP) during resuscitation is an increasingly favoured trend, as it affords many benefits to the critically ill patient’s family members. However, a previously conducted study showed that only 15.8% of surveyed Malaysian healthcare staff supported FP during resuscitation.
METHODS This cross-sectional study used a bilingual self-administered questionnaire to examine the attitudes and perceptions of the general Malaysian public toward the presence of family members during resuscitation of their loved ones. The questionnaires were randomly distributed to Malaysians in three different states and in the federal territory of Kuala Lumpur.
RESULTS Out of a total of 190 survey forms distributed, 184 responses were included for analysis. Of the 184 respondents, 140 (76.1%) indicated that they favoured FP during resuscitation. The most common reason cited was that FP during resuscitation provides family members with the assurance that everything possible had been done for their loved ones (n = 157, 85.3%). Respondents who had terminal illnesses were more likely to favour FP during resuscitation than those who did not, and this was statistically significant (95.0% vs. 73.8%; p = 0.04).
CONCLUSION FP during resuscitation was favoured by a higher percentage of the general Malaysian public as compared to Malaysian healthcare staff. This could be due to differences in concerns regarding the resuscitation process between members of the public and healthcare staff.

Keywords: family presence, invasive procedures, Malaysian, resuscitation
Singapore Med J 2014; 55(8): 439-442; http://dx.doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2014104

http://smj.org.sg/sites/default/files/5508/5508a6.pdf

REFERENCES

1. Baumhover N, Hughes L. Spirituality and support for family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitations in adults. Am J Crit Care 2009; 18:357-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2009759

2. Mazer MA, Cox LA, Capon JA. The public's attitude and perception concerning witnessed cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:2925-8. PMid:17075365

3. MacLean SL, Guzzetta CE, White C, et al. Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and invasive procedures: practices of critical care and emergency nurses. Am J Crit Care 2003; 12:246-57. PMid:12751400

4. Ersoy G, Yanturali S, Suner S, et al. Turkish patient relatives' attitudes towards family-witnessed resuscitation and affecting sociodemographic factors. Eur J Emerg Med 2009; 16:188-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328311a8dc

5. Meyers TA, Eichhorn DJ, Guzzetta CE, et al. Family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitation. Am J Nurs 2000; 100:32-42. PMid:10683641

6. Sheng CK, Lim CK, Rashidi A. A multi-center study on the attitudes of Malaysian emergency health care staff towards allowing family presence during resuscitation of adult patients. Int J Emerg Med 2010; 3:287-91. PMid:21373294 PMCid:PMC3047822

7. Emergency Nurses Association (ENA). Position statement - Family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitation in the emergency department [online]. Available at: http://www.ena.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/Position%20Statements/FamilyP.... Accessed June 2, 2013.

8. Ong ME, Chung WL, Mei JS. Comparing attitudes of the public and medical staff towards witnessed resuscitation in an Asian population. Resuscitation 2007; 73:103-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.08.007

9. Timmermans S. High touch in high tech: the presence of relatives and friends during resuscitative efforts. Sch Inq Nurs Pract 1997; 11:153-68. PMid:9329276