Share this Article
Singapore Med J 2013; 54:36-39; http://dx.doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2013009
Demographics of severe valvular aortic stenosis in Singapore
Tay EL, Lew PS, Poh KK, Saclolo R, Chia BL, Yeo TC, Tan HC, Yip JW
Correspondence: Dr Edgar Tay, Edgar_Tay@nuhs.edu.sg
ABSTRACT
Introduction The treatment of aortic valve stenosis (AS) is seeing renewed interest mainly due to the availability of transcatheter therapies. However, the number of epidemiological studies of this disease in Singapore is limited. We aimed to describe the aetiology and clinical presentation of AS in Singapore, as well as patients’ attitudes toward it. Our findings may facilitate the future planning and utilisation of resources to better manage these patients.
Methods 249 consecutive patients who underwent transthoracic echocardiography (from April 1999 to April 2008) and diagnosed with severe AS were assessed. Demographic and clinical data were collected, and patients’ decisions on surgery were determined.
Results The mean patient age was 71 (range 23–98) years. 50.2% of patients were male. The commonest presenting symptom was dyspnoea, and 40 (16.0%) patients had coexistent atrial fibrillation. The aetiology of AS was degenerative in 216 (86.7%), rheumatic in 11 (4.4%) and related to a bicuspid valve in 22 (8.9%) patients. The average peak velocity across the aortic valve was 4.2 ± 0.8 m/s and the mean aortic valve area was 0.76 ± 0.13 cm2. The overall mean logistic
EuroSCORE was 10.7 ± 12.3. 105 (42.2%) patients who were offered surgery refused. 87 (35%) deaths were seen during the follow-up period (mean duration 14.5 months), which also saw 68 (27%) patients undergo surgery and 86 (34%) patients hospitalised for heart failure.
Conclusion Degenerative AS was the commonest aetiology in this contemporary cohort of patients. Despite the known benefits of surgery, the refusal rate for surgery remained high.
Keywords: epidemiology, severe aortic stenosis, transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Singapore Med J 2013; 54:36-39; http://dx.doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2013009
REFERENCES
| 1. Tseng EE, Lee CA, Cameron DE, et al. Aortic valve replacement in the elderly. Risk factors and long-term results. Ann Surg 1997; 225:793-802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199706000-00017 |
||||
| 2. Antunes MJ. Aortic stenosis in the elderly: Rethinking strategies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30:713-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.08.006 |
||||
| 3. Bouma BJ, van Den Brink RB, van Der Meulen JH, et al. To operate or not on elderly patients with aortic stenosis: the decision and its consequences. Heart 1999; 82:143-8. | ||||
| 4. Descoutures F, Himbert D, Lepage L, et al. Contemporary surgical or percutaneous management of severe aortic stenosis in the elderly. Eur Heart J 2008; 29:1410-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn081 |
||||
| 5. Iung B. Management of the elderly patient with aortic stenosis. Heart 2008; 94:519-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2007.122804 |
||||
| 6. Varadarajan P, Kapoor N, Bansal RC, Pai RG. Survival in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis is dramatically improved by aortic valve replacement: Results from a cohort of 277 patients aged > or =80 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30:722-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.07.028 |
||||
| 7. Grube E, Schuler G, Buellesfeld L, et al. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second-and current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis: device success and 30-day clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50:69-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.047 |
||||
| 8. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 2010; 363:1597-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1008232 |
||||
| 9. Bleiziffer S, Ruge H, Mazzitelli D, et al. Results of percutaneous and transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation performed by a surgical team. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 35:615-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.12.041 |
||||
| 10. Bach DS, Siao D, Girard SE, et al. Evaluation of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who do not undergo aortic valve replacement: the potential role of subjectively overestimated operative risk. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2009; 2:533-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.848259 |
||||
| 11. Iung B, Cachier A, Baron G, et al. Decision-making in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: why are so many denied surgery? Eur Heart J 2005; 26:2714-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi471 |
||||
| 12. Rumsfeld JS. Valve surgery in the elderly: question of quality (of life)? J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42:1215-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00950-1 |
||||
| 13. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22:1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.029 |
||||
| 14. Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, et al. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 16:9-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(99)00134-7 |
||||
| 15. Zingone B, Pappalardo A, Dreas L. Logistic versus additive EuroSCORE. A comparative assessment of the two models in an independent population sample. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 26:1134-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.09.003 |
||||
| 16. Piazza N, Wenaweser P, van Gameren M, et al. Relationship between the logistic EuroSCORE and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score in patients implanted with the CoreValve ReValving system--a Bern-Rotterdam Study. Am Heart J 2010; 159:323-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2009.11.026 |
||||
| 17. Rosenhek R, Zilberszac R, Schemper M, et al. Natural history of very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 2010; 121:151-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.894170 |
||||
| 18. Varadarajan P, Kapoor N, Bansal RC, Pai RG. Clinical profile and natural history of 453 nonsurgically managed patients with severe aortic stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82:2111-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.07.048 |
||||
| 19. Wijesinghe N, Ye J, Rodés-Cabau J, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3:1122-5.6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2010.08.016 |
||||
| 20. Webb JG, Chandavimol M, Thompson CR, et al. Percutaneous aortic valve implantation retrograde from the femoral artery. Circulation 2006; 113:842-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.582882 |
||||