Educational case series of electrocardiographs during the COVID-19 pandemic and the implications for therapy

CASE 1

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A 37-year-old Malay woman with a history of hypertension, poorly controlled diabetes mellitus and polycystic ovarian syndrome presented with a one-week history of dry cough and rhinorrhoea. She had no family history of cardiac disease or sudden cardiac death. She was in close contact with a relative who had been recently diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). On examination, her temperature was 37.0°C, blood pressure 132/90 mmHg, heart rate 82 beats/minute, respiratory rate 20 breaths/minute and saturation 98% on room air. Physical examination revealed dual heart sounds and clear lungs. What does her electrocardiogram (ECG) at presentation (Fig. 1a) and prior to discharge two weeks later (Fig. 1b) show?

Fig. 1

Case 1: ECG at (a) presentation and (b) prior to discharge two weeks later.

Her chest radiograph was normal and there was no cardiomegaly (Fig. 2). Laboratory investigations revealed a normal full blood count with no evidence of lymphopenia, and C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase and ferritin levels were not elevated. Her creatinine level was normal, and there were no electrolyte derangements. The patient was managed with three days of oral lopinavir/ritonavir, but this medication was stopped due to gastrointestinal side effects.

Fig. 2

Case 1: Chest radiograph at presentation.

ECG INTERPRETATION

Both the ECGs at presentation (Fig. 1a) and discharge (Fig. 1b) show normal sinus rhythm with a right bundle branch block. The initial ECG shows a prolonged corrected QT interval of 555 ms, while the ECG prior to discharge shows that the corrected QT interval had returned to 470 ms (by Bazett’s formula). The derivation of the corrected QT interval is shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Figure shows calculation of the corrected QT interval (Bazett’s formula).

CLINICAL COURSE

The patient was admitted to the general ward for monitoring. Her nasopharyngeal swab confirmed the diagnosis of COVID-19. Her QT interval was prolonged prior to the administration of any medications. The patient was treated with oral lopinavir/ritonavir, which did not prolong the QT interval further. However, the medication was stopped due to gastrointestinal side effects. She was not switched to hydroxychloroquine because of the prolonged QT interval. Nevertheless, the patient improved clinically and did not require intensive care. She did not experience any lethal arrhythmias or palpitations while hospitalised. She recovered with no complications and tested negative for COVID-19 on two consecutive nasopharyngeal swabs. She was discharged after one month.

CASE 2

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A 79-year-old Chinese man with a background of hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and ischaemic heart disease presented with a two-week history of dry cough and intermittent fever. He had undergone a coronary artery bypass graft surgery ten years ago. He had been regularly taking clopidogrel, simvastatin, bisoprolol, amlodipine and enalapril 2.5 mg every morning. He had no known history of atrial fibrillation and denied any chest pain, palpitation or shortness of breath on exertion. He did not have any positive contact with COVID-19 cases or travel history. On examination, his temperature was 37.2°C, blood pressure 112/61 mmHg, heart rate 84 beats/minute, respiratory rate 20 breaths/minute and saturation 100% on room air. Physical examination revealed dual heart sounds and crepitations in the right lung base. His laboratory findings were unremarkable apart from hyponatraemia (serum sodium 127 mmol/L; normal: 135–145 mmol/L) and lymphopenia (absolute lymphocyte count 0.53 × 10⁹/L; normal: 0.91–3.52 × 10⁹/L). His renal function, liver function, C-reactive protein level and ferritin level were normal. His chest radiograph showed right lower zone infiltrates (Fig. 4). The rest of the lungs were clear. His COVID-19 test was positive. What does the ECG show (Fig. 5)?

Fig. 4

Case 2: Chest radiograph shows right lower zone infiltrates and the absence of cardiomegaly.

Fig. 5

Case 2: ECG at presentation.

ECG INTERPRETATION

ECG shows an irregularly irregular rhythm at 60–70 beats/minute with a fibrillatory baseline. There is an incomplete right bundle branch block. The ST segment is normal, and there is no evidence of significant QT interval prolongation (corrected QT interval [QTc] 414 ms). These findings are consistent with atrial fibrillation.

CLINICAL COURSE

The patient was admitted to the general ward and his nasopharyngeal swab confirmed the diagnosis of COVID-19. He was given symptomatic relief for his upper respiratory tract symptoms. He remained afebrile in the ward and did not develop any exertional dyspnoea or desaturation. He did not require any antiviral therapy. His sodium levels returned to normal and lymphopenia improved on repeat testing. His calculated CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 3. He was started on anticoagulation with a direct oral anticoagulant, apixaban. He recovered well and was subsequently discharged to a community care facility after two weeks.

CASE 3

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A 65-year-old Indian man with a background of hypertension presented with a one-week history of dry cough and rhinorrhoea. He had no family history of cardiac disease or sudden cardiac death. He was in close contact with a relative who had been recently diagnosed with COVID-19. On examination, his temperature was 38.4°C, blood pressure 117/74 mmHg, heart rate 102 beats/minute, respiratory rate 20 breaths/minute and saturation 95% on room air. Physical examination revealed dual heart sounds and bilateral crepitations. His initial chest radiograph showed right middle and lower zone infiltrates (Fig. 6a). Laboratory investigations revealed a normal full blood count with no evidence of lymphopenia and normal renal function. C-reactive protein was elevated at 90 mg/dL (normal: 0–10 mg/dL), while lactate dehydrogenase was 921 U/L (normal: 250–580 U/L) and serum ferritin level was 950 μg/L (normal: 20–300 μg/L). His nasopharyngeal swab confirmed the diagnosis of COVID-19. The patient subsequently deteriorated with increasing shortness of breath and oxygen requirements. He was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) and intubated for mechanical ventilation. Repeat chest radiograph showed worsening bilateral infiltrates (Fig. 6b). The patient was treated with oral lopinavir/ritonavir for five days and interferon beta-1b for three days. On Day 3 of the ICU stay, the patient turned hypotensive. Troponin I level rose from 20.1 ng/L to 85.0 ng/L (normal: 0–17.4 ng/L). His ECG at presentation (Fig. 7a) and during the hypotensive episode in the ICU are shown (Fig. 7b). What do the ECGs show?

Fig. 6

Case 3: Chest radiograph (a) at presentation and (b) after intubation.

Fig. 7

Case 3: ECG at (a) presentation and (b) during hypotensive episode in the intensive care unit.

ECG INTERPRETATION

The initial ECG (Fig. 7a) shows a normal sinus rhythm at a heart rate of 95 beats/minute. The subsequent ECG (Fig. 7b) shows the sinus rhythm deteriorating into an accelerated idioventricular rhythm of approximately 100 beats/minute. There were no discernible p waves in the latter half of the ECG, with a widened QRS complex.

CLINICAL COURSE

Within the next few hours, the patient collapsed and went into episodes of pulseless ventricular tachycardia requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation. After return of spontaneous circulation, he was started on an amiodarone infusion. Transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (55%), with normal chamber sizes and no regional wall motion abnormalities. He continued to improve clinically and was extubated after one week in the ICU. He had two consecutive nasopharyngeal swabs that tested negative for COVID-19 and was discharged from hospital after six weeks.

DISCUSSION

COVID-19 is an infection caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which was first described at the end of 2019. The first known cases were from a cluster of viral pneumonia in Wuhan, Hubei province, China.(1) Electrocardiographic manifestations at presentation are highly variable. Frequently, the ECG may reveal normal sinus rhythm with no significant abnormalities. In patients with existing heart disease, it is possible that COVID-19 may behave in a similar way to other acute systemic illness and precipitate common atrial arrhythmias. In patients with more severe cardiac involvement of COVID-19, more severe arrhythmias may be seen.

Other common electrocardiographic manifestations, in the form of cardiac and conduction system disease, have also been described in patients with COVID-19. This was in addition to other more direct cardiac manifestations such as acute coronary syndrome, myocarditis and heart failure.(2) These patients tend to be more severely ill, requiring intensive care and mechanical ventilation. Life-threatening arrhythmias may then present as cardiac involvement of the disease, or an overwhelming systemic inflammatory response induced by COVID-19 (as in Case 3).

The prevalence of arrhythmias and disease of the conduction system may be as high as 44% of patients in the intensive care unit and 17% of patients in the general cohort,(3) based on a single-centre study of 138 patients in Wuhan. Furthermore, it has been reported that 7.3% of patients presented with palpitations as part of their initial cluster of symptoms.(4) In patients that were more severely ill, the presence of acute arrhythmias and conduction system disease may have been attributed to hypoxia and the presence of electrolyte derangements. However, the aetiology that determines whether patients with COVID-19 may present with arrhythmias early in their disease or with mild disease remains to be elucidated.(5)

Patients with COVID-19 commonly present with fever and acute respiratory symptoms, such as cough, rhinorrhoea, sputum production and shortness of breath.(4) Indeed, most patients did not have symptoms of arrhythmias at presentation. Although palpitations were not an uncommon feature, it was rarely the dominant symptom reported by patients.(2)

CONCLUSION

Electrocardiographic manifestations of COVID-19 are highly variable and nonspecific. This paper illustrated three cases with different electrocardiographic features of COVID-19 and the subsequent implications for therapy. Other possible arrhythmias and conduction abnormalities were also discussed. In our institution, baseline ECGs are obtained at admission for all COVID-19 patients. Practitioners should take note of the electrocardiographic manifestations of COVID-19, as they may affect therapy and prognosis.