Share this Article
Cheong KX, Lo HY, Neo JX, Appasamy V, Chiu MT
Correspondence: Dr Cheong Kai Xiong, kaixiong.cheong@mohh.com.sg
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION We aimed to report the outcomes of inguinal hernia repair performed at Tan Tock Seng Hospital and compare them with those performed at dedicated hernia centres.
METHODS We retrospectively analysed the medical records and telephone interviews of 520 patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair in 2010.
RESULTS The majority of the patients were male (498 [95.8%] men vs. 22 [4.2%] women). The mean age was 59.9 ± 15.7 years. Most patients (n = 445, 85.6%) had unilateral hernias (25.8% direct, 64.3% indirect, 9.9% pantaloon). The overall recurrence rate was 3.8%, with a mean time to recurrence of 12.0 ± 8.6 months. Risk factors for recurrence included contaminated wounds (odds ratio [OR] 50.325; p = 0.004), female gender (OR 8.757; p = 0.003) and pantaloon hernias (OR 5.059; p = 0.013). Complication rates were as follows: chronic pain syndrome (1.2%), hypoaesthesia (5.2%), wound dehiscence (0.4%), infection (0.6%), haematoma/seroma (4.8%), urinary retention (1.3%) and intraoperative visceral injury (0.6%). Most procedures were open repairs (67.7%), and laparoscopic repair constituted 32.3% of all the inguinal hernia repairs. Open repairs resulted in longer operating times than laparoscopic repairs (86.6 mins vs. 71.6 mins; p < 0.001), longer hospital stays (2.7 days vs. 0.7 days; p = 0.020) and a higher incidence of post-repair hypoaesthesia (6.8% vs. 1.8%; p = 0.018). However, there were no significant differences in recurrence or other complications between open and laparoscopic repair.
CONCLUSION A general hospital with strict protocols and teaching methodologies can achieve inguinal hernia repair outcomes comparable to those of dedicated hernia centres.
Keywords: complications, inguinal hernia repair, laparoscopic, open, recurrence
Singapore Med J 2014; 55(4): 191-197; http://dx.doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2014051
REFERENCES
| 1. Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H, Strand L, et al. Quality assessment of 26,304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study. Lancet 2001; 358:1124-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06251-1 | ||||
| 2. Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T. Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis. Ann Surg 2003; 237:129-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200301000-00018 | ||||
| 3. Jansen PL, Klinge U, Jansen M, Junge K. Risk factors for early recurrence after inguinal hernia repair. BMC Surg 2009; 9:18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-9-18 | ||||
| 4. Butters M, Redecke J, Köninger J. Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of Shouldice, Lichtenstein and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repairs. Br J Surg 2007; 94:562-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5733 | ||||
| 5. Kingsnorth AN, Bowley DM, Porter C. A prospective study of 1000 hernias: results of the Plymouth Hernia Service. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2003; 85:18-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588403321001363 | ||||
| 6. The MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group. Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. Lancet 1999; 354:185-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10010-7 | ||||
| 7. Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Mitchell P, et al. Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the postrepair patient. Ann Surg 1996; 224:598-602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199611000-00003 | ||||
| 8. Jenkins JT, O'Dwyer PJ. Inguinal hernias. BMJ 2008; 336:269-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39450.428275.AD | ||||
| 9. Finley RK Jr, Miller SF, Jones LM. Elimination of urinary retention following inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am Surg 1991; 57:486-8. | ||||
| 10. Koch CA, Grinberg GG, Farley DR. Incidence and risk factors for urinary retention after endoscopic hernia repair. Am J Surg 2006; 191:381-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.10.042 | ||||
| 11. Beldi G, Haupt N, Ipaktchi R, Wagner M, Candinas D. Postoperative hypoesthesia and pain: qualitative assessment after open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2008; 22:129-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9388-4 | ||||
| 12. Forte A, D'Urso A, Gallinaro LS, et al. [Complications of inguinal hernia repair]. G Chir 2002; 23:88-92. Italian. | ||||
| 13. Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL. Open "tension-free" repair of inguinal hernias: the Lichtenstein technique. Eur J Surg 1996; 162:447-53. | ||||
| 14. Kurzer M, Belsham PA, Kark AE. The Lichtenstein repair for groin hernias. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83:1099-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00134-8 | ||||
| 15. Shouldice EB. The Shouldice repair for groin hernias. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83:1163-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00121-X | ||||
| 16. Glassow F. The Shouldice Hospital technique. Int Surg 1986; 71:148-53. | ||||
| 17. Alfieri S, Amid PK, Campanelli G, et al. International guidelines for prevention and management of post-operative chronic pain following inguinal hernia surgery. Hernia 2011; 15:239-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0798-9 | ||||
| 18. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004; 363:157-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3 | ||||
| 19. NYU Langone Medical Center Division of General Surgery. Pantaloon Hernias. In: NYU Langone Medical Center [online]. Available at: http://surgery.med.nyu.edu/general/patient-care/hernias/types-hernia/pan.... Accessed February 24, 2013. | ||||
| 20. Rosemar A, Angerås U, Rosengren A, Nordin P. Effect of body mass index on groin hernia surgery. Ann Surg 2010; 252:397-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e985a1 | ||||
| 21. Sorensen LT, Friis E, Jorgensen T, et al. Smoking is a risk factor for recurrence of groin hernia. World J Surg 2002; 26:397-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-001-0238-6 | ||||
| 22. Junge K, Rosch R, Klinge U, et al. Risk factors related to recurrence in inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective analysis. Hernia 2006; 10:309-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-006-0096-0 | ||||
| 23. Neumayer LA, Gawande AA, Wang J, et al. Proficiency of surgeons in inguinal hernia repair: effect of experience and age. Ann Surg 2005; 242:344-8. | ||||
| 24. Houghton IT, Aun CS, Gin T, Lau JT. Inter-ethnic differences in postoperative pethidine requirements. Anaesth Intensive Care 1992; 20:52-5. | ||||
| 25. O'Reilly EA, Burke JP, O'Connell PR. A meta-analysis of surgical morbidity and recurrence after laparoscopic and open repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Ann Surg 2012; 255:846-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824e96cf | ||||
| 26. McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, et al. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (1):CD001785. | ||||