Share this Article
Nidugala H, Bhargavi C, Avadhani R, Bhaskar B
Correspondence: Dr Bhagya Bhaskar, bagyabs@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION To the best of our knowledge, the sexually dimorphic characteristics of the craniofacial region among the South Indian population are not available in the current literature. We aimed to determine these characteristics using discriminant function analysis.
METHODS A total of 80 recent skulls (40 male, 40 female) from the Department of Anatomy, Yenepoya Medical College, Yenepoya University, Karnataka, India, were analysed. Ten craniofacial parameters were measured and subjected to univariate and multivariate statistical analyses using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 13.0.
RESULTS Statistical analyses revealed that the differences in the bizygomatic, orbital and biorbital breadths of males and females were significant (p < 0.05). Direct method gave an accuracy of 68.8% for sex determination. In stepwise analysis, bizygomatic breadth and upper facial height were selected, giving a 65.0% accuracy for sex prediction.
CONCLUSION Craniofacial parameters are sexually dimorphic. The present study established several features of craniofacial morphometry that can be used for sex determination among the South Indian population. The findings of the present study serve as a foundation for future studies that aim to compare craniofacial parameters among various ethnic groups in South India.
Keywords: craniofacial region, discriminant function analysis, metric parameters, sexual dimorphism, South Indian population
Singapore Med J 2013; 54(8): 458-462; http://dx.doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2013154
REFERENCES
| 1. Rogers TL. Determination of sex of human remains through cranial morphology. J Forensic Sci 2005; 50:493-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/JFS2003385 | ||||
| 2. Naccarato S, Petersen S, John GL. Skull features as clues to age, sex, race and lifestyle. J Forensic Ident 2008; 58:172-81. | ||||
| 3. Bilge Y, Kedici PS, Alakoç, YD, Ülküer KU, ?lkyaz YY. The identification of a dismembered human body: a multidisciplinary approach. Forensic Sci Int 2003; 137: 141-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(03)00334-7 | ||||
| 4. Saini V, Srivastava R, Rai RK, et al. An Osteometric Study of Northern Indian Populations for Sexual Dimorphism in Craniofacial region. J Forensic Sci 2011; 56:700-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01707.x | ||||
| 5. Franklin D, O'Higgins P, Oxnard CE, Dadour I. Discriminant function sexing of the mandible of indigenous South Africans. Forensic Sci Int 2008; 179:84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.03.014 | ||||
| 6. Gapert R, Black S, Last J. Sex determination from the foramen magnum: discriminant function analysis in an eighteenth and nineteenth century British sample. Int J Legal Med 2009; 123:25-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0256-0 | ||||
| 7. Kranioti EF, Iscan MY, Michalodimitrakis M. Craniometric analysis of modern Cretan population. Forensic Sci Int 2008; 180:110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.06.018 | ||||
| 8. Vodanovic M, Dumancic J, Demo Z, Mihelic D. [Determination of sex by discriminant function analysis of mandibles from two Croatian archeological sites.] Acta Stomatol Croat 2006; 40:263-77. Croatian. | ||||
| 9. Celbis O, Iscan MY, Soysal Z, Cagdir S. Sexual diagnosis of the glabellar region. Legal Med (Tokyo) 2001; 3:162-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1344-6223(01)00025-6 | ||||
| 10. Kemkes A, Gobel T. Metric assessment of the ''mastoid triangle'' for sex determination: a validation study. J Forensic Sci 2006; 51:985-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00232.x | ||||
| 11. Suazo GIC, Zavando MDA, Smith RL. Sex determination using mastoid process measurements in Brazilian skulls. Int J Morphol 2008; 26:941-4. | ||||
| 12. Wescott DJ, Moore-Jansen PH. Metric variation in the human occipital bone: forensic anthropological applications. J Forensic Sci 2001; 46:1159-63. | ||||
| 13. Gulekon IN, Turgut HB. The external occipital protuberance: can it be used as a criterion in the determination of sex? J Forensic Sci 2003; 48:513-6. | ||||
| 14. Naikmasur VG, Shrivastava R, Mutalik S. Determination of sex in South Indians and immigrant Tibetans from cephalometric analysis and discriminant functions. Forensic Sci Int 2010; 197:122.e1-6. | ||||
| 15. Oladipo GS, Akande PA, Osogba IG, Yorkum KL. Anthropometric studies of inner canthal distance, outer canthal distance and canthal index of adult Ibibios. Asian J of Med Sci 2011; 3:14-6. | ||||
| 16. Steyn M , Iscan MY. Sexual dimorphism in the crania and mandibles of South African whites. Forensic Sci Int 1998; 98: 9-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(98)00120-0 | ||||
| 17. Dayal MR, Spocter MA, Bidmos MA. An assessment of sex using the skull of black South Africans by discriminant function analysis. Homo 2008; 59:209-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2007.01.001 | ||||
| 18. Krishan K. Anthropometry in Forensic Medicine and Forensic Science-'Forensic Anthropometry'. Internet J Forensic Sci 2007; 2(1). | ||||
| 19. Farkas LG , Posnick J C, Hreezko TM. Anthropometric growth study of the head. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992; 29:303-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1992)029<0303:AGSOTH>2.3.CO;2 | ||||
| 20. Franklin D, Freedman L, Milne N, Oxnard CE. A geometric morphometric study of sexual dimorphism in the crania of indigenous southern Africans. S. Afr J Sci 2006; 102:229-38. | ||||
| 21. Franklin D, Freedman L, Milne N. Sexual dimorphism and discriminant function sexing in indigenous South Africa crania. Homo 2005; 55:213-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2004.08.001 | ||||
| 22. Malhotra KC. Morphological composition of the people of India. J Hum Evol 1978; 7:45-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2484(78)80035-9 | ||||