Share this Article
Lim YK, Chia YN, Yam KL
Correspondence: Dr Lim Yong Kuei Timothy, yongkuei@hotmail.com
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION For many decades, Wertheim’s radical hysterectomy via laparotomy, also known as Wertheim’s radical abdominal hysterectomy (RAH), has been the traditional surgical approach for operable stage IB cervical cancer. However, many established cancer centres worldwide have recently shown total laparoscopic Wertheim’s radical hysterectomy (TLRH) to be a safe and feasible alternative to the conventional abdominal route for early cervical cancer management. This technique was introduced in Singapore in 2009.
METHODS This was a prospective pilot study comparing TLRH with RAH in a single large tertiary institution in Singapore. Inclusion criteria included surgically fit patients with early cervical cancer and no radiological evidence of regional or distant metastases.
RESULTS From November 2009 to February 2011, a total of 18 TLRHs and 30 RAHs were performed. The median blood loss in the TLRH group was significantly lower than that in the RAH group (300 mL vs. 500 mL; p = 0.04). However, there was no statistically significant difference found between the two techniques in terms of operative time, hospital stay, bladder recovery, total lymph node yield or adjuvant treatment. No intraoperative bladder, ureteric or bowel complications were observed in the two groups. Postoperative complications occurred in 2 (11.1%) TLRH patients and 4 (13.3%) RAH patients. With a median follow-up of 37.3 (range 10–68) weeks, the rate of recurrence was found to be 5.6% for the TLRH group and 10.0% for the RAH group.
CONCLUSION The results of our study suggest that with appropriate patient selection and increased experience, TLRH can be a safe and effective procedure for the management of early cervical cancer in Singapore.
Keywords: cervical cancer, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy
Singapore Med J 2013; 54(12): 683-688; http://dx.doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2013242
REFERENCES
| 1. Nezhat CR, Burrell MO, Nezhat FR, Benigno BB, Welander CE. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic bode dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166:864-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(92)91351-A | ||||
| 2. Querleu D. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168:1643-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(11)90818-7 | ||||
| 3. Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Ballon SC. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187:340-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.123035 | ||||
| 4. Pomel C, Atallah D, Le Bouedec G, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer: 8 year experience of a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 91:534-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.08.035 | ||||
| 5. Abu-Rustum NR, Gemignani ML, Moore K, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy using the argon-beam coagulator: pilot data and comparison to laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 91:402-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00518-3 | ||||
| 6. Nezhat F, Mahdavi A, Nagarsheth NP, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using harmonic shears. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006; 13:20-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2005.08.011 | ||||
| 7. Frumovitz M, dos Reis R, Sun CC, et al. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110:96-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000268798.75353.04 | ||||
| 8. Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Ciravolo G, et al. Surgicopathologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 106:502- 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.04.027 | ||||
| 9. Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, Perone C, Vicario V. Feasibility, morbidity and safety of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: our experience. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007; 14:584-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2007.04.001 | ||||
| 10. Li G, Yan X, Shang H, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 105:176-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.11.011 | ||||
| 11. Pellegrino A, Vizza E, Fruscio R, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with Ib1 stage cervical cancer: analysis of surgical and oncological outcome. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35:98-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2008.07.005 | ||||
| 12. Lee CL, Wu KY, Huang KG, Lee PS, Yen CF. Long-term survival outcomes of laparoscopically assisted radical hysterectomy in treating early-stage cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203:165.e1-7. | ||||
| 13. Naik R, Jackson KS, Lopes A, Cross P, Henry JA. Laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy - a randomised phase II trial: perioperative outcomes and surgicopathological measurements. BJOG 2010; 117:746-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02479.x | ||||
| 14. Park NY, Chong GO, Hong DG, et al. Oncologic results and surgical morbidity of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: long term follow-up. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2011; 21:355-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0b013e31820731bb | ||||
| 15. Yan X, Li G, Shang H, et al. Twelve-year experience with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 120:362-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.11.033 | ||||
| 16. Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009; 105:103-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.012 | ||||
| 17. Berek JS, Hacker NF, eds. Practical Gynaecologic Oncology. PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. | ||||
| 18. Ralph G, Winter R, Michelitsch L, Tamussino K. Radicality of the parametrial resection and dysfunction of lower urinary tract after radical hysterectomy. Eur J Gynecol Oncol 1991, 12:27-30. | ||||
| 19. Zanoio L, Albiero A, Divirqilio G. [Radical hysterectomy. Operative complications]. Minerva Ginecol 1993; 45:591-6. Italian. | ||||
| 20. Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, et al. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet 1997; 350:535-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02250-2 | ||||
| 21. Kinney WK, Alvarez RD, Reid GC, et al. Value of adjuvant whole pelvis irradiation after Wertheim hysterectomy for early stage squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with pelvic nodal metastasis: a matched control study. Gynecol Oncol 1989; 34:258-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(89)90156-X | ||||
| 22. Martínez A, Querleu D, Leblanc E, Narducci F, Ferron G. Low incidence of port-site metastases after laparoscopic staging for uterine cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 118:145-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.03.011 | ||||
| 23. Tjalma WA, Winter-Roach BA, Rowlands P, De Barros Lopes A. Port-site recurrence following laparoscopic surgery in cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2001; 11:409-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1438.2001.01049.x | ||||
| 24. Zivanovic O, Sonoda Y, Diaz JP, et al. The rate of port-site metastases after 2251 laparoscopic procedures in women with underlying malignant disease. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111:431-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.024 | ||||
| 25. Reade C, Hauspy J, Schmuck ML, Moens F. Characterizing the learning curve for laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: buddy operating as a technique for accelerating skill acquisition. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2011; 15:930 -5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182157a44 | ||||
| 26. Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, Montero RP, Magtibay PM. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 109:86-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.01.011 | ||||
| 27. Ramirez PT, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, dos Reis R, Frumovitz M. Laparoscopic and robotic techniques for radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 110(3 Suppl 2):S21-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.03.013 | ||||