Wu RS, Chan JX, Chong SL, Ong GY, Ng KC
Correspondence: Dr Ryan Song Lian Wu, ryan.wu@mohh.com.sg
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION Toy-related injuries, a common reason for emergency department visits in the paediatric population, constitute a significant health burden in Singapore. Although government regulations imposed on toys and childcare-related items are in place, parents and caregivers still play a pivotal role in ensuring toy safety in children. We hypothesised that deficiencies in knowledge surrounding toy safety issues exist in our adult population.
METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire study at KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore, to examine the current attitudes, knowledge and practices of the local population regarding toy safety. Hypothetical questions on toy selection were included in the questionnaire to assess respondents’ ability to identify appropriate toys and discern potentially dangerous toys for a specified age group.
RESULTS The scores of the 93 respondents showed that they were less able to identify appropriate toys for children in the 1–2 years (66.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 61.4%–72.0%) and 2–3 years age groups (69.9%; 95% CI 65.5%–74.3%) than for children in the 0–1 year (82.8%; 95% CI 79.9%–85.7%) and 3–5 years age groups (85.2%; 95% CI 81.2%–89.2%). Our survey also identified key areas for improvement (e.g. educational efforts and government regulation) in current practices in order to attain a higher level of toy safety.
CONCLUSION Our study highlights the current knowledge deficit in toy safety issues and the need for improvements in regulation, education and surveillance in order to minimise the risk of toy-related injuries in children.
Keywords: emergency, Singapore, survey, toy-related injuries, toy safety
Singapore Med J 2013; 54(11): 639-644; http://dx.doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2013227
REFERENCES
1. Tu Y. Toy-related deaths and injuries – calendar year 2009. US Consumer Product Safety Commission [online]. Available at: www.cpsc.gov/library/toymemo09.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2012. | ||||
2. Chowdhury RT. Toy-related deaths and injuries – calendar year 2006. US Consumer Product Safety Commission [online]. Available at: www.cpsc.gov/library/toymemo06.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2012. | ||||
3. McDonald J. Memorandum: Toy-related deaths and injuries – calendar year 2003. US Consumer Product Safety Commission [online]. Available at: www.cpsc.gov/library/foia/foia05/os/toymemo03.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2012. | ||||
4. McDonald J. Memorandum: Toy-related deaths and injuries – calendar year 2002. US Consumer Product Safety Commission [online]. Available at: www.cpsc.gov/library/foia/foia04/os/toydeath.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2012. | ||||
5. McDonald J. Memorandum: Toy-related deaths and injuries – calendar year 2001. US Consumer Product Safety Commission [online]. Available at: www.cpsc.gov/library/toydth01.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2012. | ||||
6. McDonald J. Memorandum: Toy-related deaths and injuries, calendar year 2000. US Consumer Product Safety Commission [online]. Available at: www.cpsc.gov/library/toydth00.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2012. | ||||
7. Committee on Injury, Violence, and Poison Prevention. Prevention of choking among children. Pediatrics 2010; 125:601-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-2862 | ||||
8. For Kids' Sake: Think Toy Safety. In: US Consumer Product Safety Commission Publication 281 [online]. Available at: www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/pubs/281.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2012. | ||||
9. Federal Hazardous Substances Act of 2011, Pub. L. No. 86-613; 74 Stat. 372 (July 12, 1960). | ||||
10. Standard Consumer Safety Specification on Toy Safety. In: American Society for Testing and Materials [online]. Available at: www.astm.org/Standards/F963. Accessed July 12, 2012. | ||||
11. Requirements under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act: Labeling and Banning Requirements for Chemicals and Other Hazardous Substances, 15 U.S.C. § 1261 and 16 C.F.R. Part 1500. In: US Consumer Product Safety Commission [online]. Available at: http://www.cpsc.gov/businfo/regsumfhsa.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2012. | ||||
12. Consumer Protection (Consumer Goods Safety Requirements) Regulations 2011 (CGSR). In: SPRING Singapore [online]. Available at: www.spring.gov.sg/QualityStandards/CPS/Documents/CGSR_InfoBooklet.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2012. | ||||
13. Goodson B, Bronson M. Which Toy for Which Child: a Consumer's Guide for Selecting Suitable Toys. US Consumer Product Safety Commission [online]. Available at: http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/pubs/285.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2012. | ||||
14. Afolabi OA, Alabi BS, Segun-Busari S, Dunmade AD, Foluwasayo E. Paediatric aural foreign bodies: a challenge to care givers. Internet J Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 11:7. | ||||
15. Mukherjee A, Haldar D, Dutta S, et al. Ear, nose and throat foreign bodies in children: a search for socio-demographic correlates. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 75:510-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.01.006 | ||||
16. Figueiredo RR, Azevedo AA, Kós AO, Tomita S. Complications of ENT foreign bodies: a retrospective study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2008; 74:7-15. | ||||
17. Trouble in Toyland – 25th Annual Survey of Toy Safety. US Public Interest Research Group [online]. Available at: www.uspirg.org/sites/pirg/files/reports/toylandbody2010UPDATE.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2012. | ||||
18. Toy Safety. In: US Consumer Product Safety Commission [online]. Available at: http://www.cpsc.gov/info/toysafety/index.html. Accessed July 12, 2012. | ||||
19. Directive 2009/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on the safety of toys. Official Journal of the European Union [serial online] 2009; L170:1-37. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/toys/files/tsd-guidance/tsd_rev_1.... Accessed October 23, 2013. | ||||
20. Health Promotion Board. Home toy safety [online]. Available at: www.hpb.gov.sg/HOPPortal/article?id=3232. Accessed July 12, 2012. | ||||