Joethy J, Sebastin SJ, Chong KS, Peng YP, Puhaindran ME
Correspondence: Dr Mark E Puhaindran, Mark_E_Puhaindran@nuhs.edu.sg
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION Early debridement and coverage has long been regarded as the standard of care for open fractures of the lower limb, as infection is a serious complication. However, the best time for wound closure remains controversial. Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is thought to result in reduced flap infection and failure. To determine the effect of NPWT, we reviewed patients with open fractures of the lower limb and compared the rates of infection and flap failure in two time-based cohorts.
METHODS Two cohorts of patients (periods 2003–2004 and 2008–2009) with Gustilo type IIIB open tibial fractures were recruited and their outcomes were compared. In the 2003–2004 cohort, wounds were dressed with occlusive dressing. In the 2008–2009 cohort, all patients underwent NPWT. Data was retrospectively analysed with regard to infection, failure, age, type of flap, comorbidities and defect size. The incidences of infection and flap failure were further analysed for any statistical difference between the different treatment protocols.
RESULTS In the 2003–2004 cohort, 33% of patients developed infection and 11% had flap failure. However, in the 2008–2009 cohort, 10% of patients developed infection and 6% had flap failure. The difference in the incidence of infection was statistically significant between the two cohorts (p = 0.029).
CONCLUSION Patients in the 2008–2009 cohort had better outcomes, and we are of the opinion that performing NPWT may have contributed to this result.
Keywords: free flap, negative-pressure wound therapy, occlusive dressing, open tibial fractures, vacuum-aided closure
Singapore Med J 2013; 54(11): 620-623; http://dx.doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2013221
REFERENCES
1. Godina M. Early microsurgical reconstruction of complex trauma of the extremities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 78:285-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198609000-00001 | ||||
2. Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI, McGuirt W. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38:553-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199706000-00001 | ||||
3. Stannard JP, Volgas DA, Stewart R, McGwin G Jr, Alonso JE. Negative pressure wound therapy after severe open fractures: a prospective randomized study. J Orthop Trauma 2009; 23:552-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181a2e2b6 | ||||
4. Friedrich PL. Die aseptische Versorgung frischer Wundern. Langenbecks Arch Klin Chir 1898; 57:288-310. German. | ||||
5. Peterson AS. The "Golden Period" for Wound Repair. J Lancaster Gen Hospital 2010; 5:134-5. | ||||
6. Pollak AN. Timing of debridement of open fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006; 14:S48-51. | ||||
7. Bednar DA, Parikh J. Effect of time delay from injury to primary management on the incidence of deep infection after open fractures of the lower extremities caused by blunt trauma in adults. J Orthop Trauma 1993; 7:532-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199312000-00008 | ||||
8. Ashford RU, Mehta JA, Cripps R. Delayed presentation is no barrier to satisfactory outcome in the management of open tibial fractures. Injury 20 0 4; 35:411- 6. | ||||
9. Spencer J, Smith A, Woods D. The effect of time delay on infection in open long-bone fractures: a 5-year prospective audit from a district general hospital. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2004; 86:108-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588404322827491 | ||||
10. Pollak AN, Jones AL, Castillo RC, et al. The relationship between time to surgical debridement and incidence of infection after open high-energy lower extremity trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92:7-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00984 | ||||
11. Yaremchuk MJ, Brumback RJ, Manson PN, et al. Acute and definitive management of traumatic osteocutaneous defects of the lower extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 80:1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198707000-00001 | ||||
12. Baumeister S, Follmar KE, Zenn MR, Erdmann D, Levin LS. Strategy for reoperative free flaps after failure of a first flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122:962-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181811ca0 | ||||
13. Khouri RK, Shaw WW. Reconstruction of the lower extremity with microvascular free flaps: a 10-year experience with 304 consecutive cases. J Trauma 1989; 29:1086-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198908000-00005 | ||||
14. Parrett BM, Matros E, Pribaz JJ, Orgill DP. Lower extremity trauma: trends in the management of soft-tissue reconstruction of open tibia-fibula fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117:1315-22; discussion 1323-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000204959.18136.36 | ||||
15. Erba P, Ogawa R, Ackermann M, et al. Angiogenesis in wounds treated by microdeformational wound therapy. Ann Surg 2011; 253:402-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820563a8 | ||||
16. Blum ML, Esser M, Richardson M, Paul E, Rosenfeldt FL. Negative pressure wound therapy reduces deep infection rate in open tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2012; 26:499-505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31824133e3 | ||||
17. DeFranzo AJ, Argenta LC, Marks MW, et al. The use of vacuum-assisted closure therapy for the treatment of lower-extremity wounds with exposed bone. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108:1184-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200110000-00013 | ||||
18. Bhattacharyya T, Mehta P, Smith M, Pomahac B. Routine use of wound vacuum-assisted closure does not allow coverage delay for open tibia fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121:1263-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000305536.09242.a6 | ||||
19. Nanchahal J, Nayagam D, Khan U, et al. Standards for the Management of Open Fractures of the Lower Limb. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press, 2009. |